Bhutani T, Jayade S, Rege S, Penton H, Patel V, Kalirai S, Wolin D, Boyle K, Seigel L. Evaluating prevalence and consequence of residual disease in individuals with psoriasis receiving apremilast treatment: results from a US patient survey. J Dermatolog Trea. 2024 Jun 24;35(1):2366532. doi: 10.1080/09546634.2024.2366532


PURPOSE: This noninterventional, cross-sectional survey estimated the prevalence and consequences of residual disease in apremilast-treated US adults with moderate to severe psoriasis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Residual disease was defined as experiencing moderate, severe, or very severe psoriasis over the past week or having ≥3% body surface area affected, despite treatment. Factors associated with residual disease and its effects on flare-ups, humanistic burden, and health care resource utilization (HCRU) were evaluated.

RESULTS: Of the 344 apremilast users (mean age, 44.9 years; female, 65.4%), 174 (50.6%) had residual disease. It was more prevalent in Black versus White participants (OR, 4.5; 95% CI, 1.6-12.2), those receiving apremilast for ≥1 versus <1 year (OR, 16.5; 95% CI, 7.9-34.4), those reporting ≥2 versus 0 to 1 flare-ups during the past 3 months (OR, 10.0; 95% CI, 5.0-20.1), and those with ≥4 versus 1 to 3 body regions affected at time of survey (OR, 8.6; 95% CI, 3.8-19.8). Participants with versus without residual disease self-reported more psoriasis flare-ups over the past 3 months (mean, 4.7 vs 0.9; P<0.001) and more anxiety (89.7% vs 50.0%; P<0.001) and depression (69.0% vs 23.6%; P<0.001) over the past 30 days.

CONCLUSION: Generally, participants with versus without residual disease also had significantly more comorbidities and greater HCRU.

Share on: